The MIT license, stable versioning, frequent releases, and modest dependency set make adoption straightforward. Maintenance depth is limited by one recent contributor, no repository tests, and no security policy.
67%
Total Score
50
100
88
50
The repository has a README, but it reports no tests and no changelog; those omissions reduce project transparency and confidence in regression coverage, while the missing artifact README is not itself concerning for this source-oriented package.
The repository is owned by an individual account rather than an organization, so the single-maintainer and single-contributor findings represent a genuine continuity risk.
One contributor made all commits in the last 3 months, so the project has a concentrated maintenance burden with no demonstrated backup contributor.
Only one commit was recorded in the last 3 months, which is weak activity relative to the package's frequent release history and leaves maintenance depth uncertain.
Composer is used for builds, but no security scanning tool was detected; the missing automated security coverage is a modest transparency and maintenance gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
cocur/slugify Version ^v4.5.1 | — | — |
vlucas/phpdotenv Version ^v5.6.0 | — | — |
symfony/var-dumper Version ^v7.1.2 | — | — |
zouloux/simple-php-router Version ^5.4.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.