The MIT license, matching repository, and small runtime dependency set improve transparency. No tests or security scanning tools are evident, making future maintenance harder to verify.
47%
Total Score
50
100
69
83
Only two releases were published, both in August 2020, with none in the last six years. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite the repository remaining available.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the old last push, this materially increases the risk that defects will remain unaddressed.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is not decisive for a small package, but it provides little supporting evidence of community adoption or review.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tool was detected. This is a maintenance and transparency gap rather than evidence of unsafe behavior on its own.
The repository has no security policy. That weakens vulnerability-reporting transparency, though the absence is a secondary concern compared with the inactive release and commit history.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version >5.3 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.