The package has a clear README, a narrow runtime dependency, and no install-time scripts. Its license files conflict with the MIT declaration, and the repository has no security policy. Pin v1.0 only when replacing it would be costly.
46%
Total Score
100
100
71
75
The package has only one release, published nearly seven years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency.
The artifact contains license files, so the release is licensed, but the manifest declares MIT while the detected license is Apache-2.0. That mismatch creates uncertainty for downstream users.
The repository is not archived, which is positive, but it was last pushed on the same day as the sole release nearly seven years ago. The stale source materially lowers confidence in ongoing maintenance.
The linked repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and vulnerability-reporting gap, though it is less severe than the long absence of releases.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.