Healthy and usable, with some maintenance caveats. It has a long release history, a current stable release, active organization backing, and a matching repository, but recent work is sparse and concentrated in one contributor, with no tests or security policy shown.
78%
Total Score
63
100
83
83
A README is present and directs development to the main repository, but neither the package nor repository contains tests or a changelog. Those omissions reduce maintenance transparency for a library package.
All recent commits came from one contributor, creating concentration risk. Organization ownership provides some ability to hand off maintenance, so this is a caution rather than a severe risk.
Only one commit was made in the last three months by one active maintainer. The repository is not inactive, but the very low recent activity is a maintenance concern.
No new or closed issues or pull requests were recorded in the last month, and issue totals are unavailable. This provides little evidence of active community maintenance.
The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher, showing limited community adoption. Popularity is supporting evidence, so this lowers confidence more than it affects the health verdict.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
zf1s/zend-service Version ^1.16.2 | — | — |
zf1s/zend-validate Version ^1.16.2 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.