It has a clear MIT license, a matching repository, tests, and release notes. The single-maintainer project and weak workflow controls make long-term reliance a concern.
52%
Total Score
50
100
93
100
Only one registry maintainer is listed. The repository is owned by a matching user account rather than an organization, so there is little visible redundancy if that maintainer becomes unavailable.
The package has 12 releases over about two years, but none in the last 12 months despite a median interval of about 7 days, indicating a sharp loss of release activity.
The repository had no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, which is a meaningful maintenance and abandonment concern.
The audit found two high-confidence template-injection findings in annotate.yml and all 7 action references are unpinned. There is no pull_request_target or workflow_run trigger, so these are workflow-hygiene concerns rather than a severe supply-chain finding on their own.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
zero-to-prod/data-model Version ^v81.2.0 | — | — |
zero-to-prod/package-helper Version ^1.1.3 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.