The workflow needs cleanup, with unpinned actions and high-confidence template-injection findings. A clear README, repository tests, release notes, security policy, and active release history provide useful transparency despite the recent pause in commits.
61%
Total Score
63
100
94
100
One registry publishing maintainer indicates a thin publishing base; the linked repository is user-owned rather than organization-owned, so there is no organizational backing shown to compensate.
The registry namespace and repository owner match, but the owner is a user account, so the signals show package continuity without organizational backing.
The package has 36 releases over about 700 days, but only one release in the last 12 months; the recent cadence suggests maintenance has slowed.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, a concrete sign that maintenance has paused after the latest release.
All five workflows were analyzed, but all seven action references are unpinned, one workflow has broad top-level write permissions, and two high-confidence template-injection findings were reported in annotate.yml. No untrusted checkout or pull_request_target trigger was found, so these are workflow-hygiene concerns rather than a standalone severe risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
zero-to-prod/data-model Version ^v81.0.0 | — | — |
zero-to-prod/validate-url Version ^71.0 | — | — |
zero-to-prod/package-helper Version ^1.1.3 | — | — |
zero-to-prod/validate-email Version ^71.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.