The repository includes tests, a changelog, and a clear README, with matching MIT licensing. Workflow review found only a low-confidence cache warning, but there is no security policy or scanning.
38%
Total Score
0
67
67
The package has had no releases in the last 12 months, and its latest release was over five years ago despite 11 total releases. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers over the last three months, consistent with the release history's prolonged inactivity.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these counters provide no additional confidence that the project is actively used or supported.
The project uses Composer and Make, which supports reproducible project operations, but no security-scanning tools were detected. This is a secondary hygiene gap rather than evidence of abandonment by itself.
The repository has no security policy, leaving maintainers without a documented vulnerability-reporting path. The absence of security scanning in repo_tooling adds some transparency concern.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^6.0 || ~7.0 | — | — |
ocramius/package-versions Version ^1.2 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.