The organization-backed project includes a clear README and a stable 1.0.0 release. Its licensing is undocumented, the repository does not identify the package, and the source has shown no activity since its only release, making long-term support uncertain.
43%
Total Score
50
71
50
This is the package's only release, published 658 days ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That leaves little evidence of ongoing maintenance for a dependency.
The repository recorded 0 commits and 0 active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with a project that has been inactive since its initial release. No provided signal compensates for this maintenance gap.
Neither the package metadata nor the artifact or repository contains a recognized license or license file. This creates a concrete transparency and reuse risk for a package intended to be consumed as a dependency.
The linked repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package. Although name differences can occur in monorepos, these combined values weaken confidence that the repository clearly represents this package.
The linked repository has no security policy. This is a maintenance and disclosure gap, though it is less significant than the lack of release and commit activity.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.