The README and release packaging provide enough guidance for a small client library. The Apache-2.0 license file is helpful, but its mismatch with the proprietary declaration needs clarification. Organization backing and a non-archived repository provide some continuity despite the limited maintenance activity.
57%
Total Score
75
80
75
The artifact and repository contain an Apache-2.0 license file, but the manifest declares the package proprietary. This licensing mismatch should be resolved before adoption.
Only two releases exist, with none in the last 12 months; the latest release was about 13 months ago. This is a meaningful maintenance concern for a young package.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months, reinforcing the evidence of stalled maintenance.
No repository security policy is present. This is a transparency gap, although the small seven-file project limits the significance of the omission.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
laravel/framework Version >=8 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.