xuepengdong/phalapiredis

The repository is tiny and has no tests, changelog, security scanning, or recent commits. It does have a recent release, a clear README, a matching repository, and no install scripts, but the license files identify AGPL-3.0 while the manifest declares GPL-3.0-or-later.

Latest v3.0

Packagist

63%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Dependencies

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

License

The manifest declares GPL-3.0-or-later and includes a license file, but the detected license text is AGPL-3.0. The mismatch requires resolving the actual licensing terms before adoption.

Package file tree

The artifact and repository have the same small, focused six-file tree, including a README, license, manifest, configuration, and source file. This is transparent but provides little evidence of broader engineering maturity.

Project backing

The repository is owned by an individual user rather than an organization, so the small maintainer base represents limited visible project backing.

Repo commit activity

The repository had zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last 3 months. This is a concrete sign of weak current maintenance despite the recent registry release.

Repo popularity

The repository has 1 star, 0 forks, and 2 watchers, indicating very limited independent adoption or review. Popularity is supporting evidence, but this adds to the thin maturity picture.