The package includes tests, a changelog, release notes, and clear usage documentation. Its organization-backed repository is not archived and the release is stable, but maintenance and workflow hygiene warrant care before adoption.
64%
Total Score
75
100
88
75
The package has 10 releases over about 9 years, but none in the last 12 months and the latest registry release was about 2.5 years ago. This indicates materially slowed maintenance despite its established history.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months. Combined with the long gap in registry releases, this raises the risk that fixes or compatibility updates may be slow.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy. That weakens transparency around vulnerability reporting and response expectations.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no reported audit findings or untrusted-trigger sinks, but all 3 action references are unpinned. The absence of a top-level permissions block is acceptable on its own, while unpinned actions remain a supply-chain hygiene concern.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
xp-framework/core Version ^12.0 | ^11.0 | ^10.0 | ^9.0 | ^8.0 | ^7.0 | — | — |
xp-framework/rdbms Version ^13.0 | ^12.0 | ^11.0 | ^10.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.