The repository has one star and no security policy. It includes a README and release notes, but the declared MIT license differs from the EPL-1.0 license file.
40%
Total Score
64
75
Only two releases were published, both in November 2021, with no releases in the last 12 months. This long period without a new release is strong evidence of abandonment risk.
The artifact includes a license file, but it identifies EPL-1.0 while the manifest declares MIT. The package is licensed, yet the mismatch creates avoidable legal uncertainty.
The repository name matches the package, but its README does not mention the package name. That makes package ownership less clearly documented and is a minor transparency concern.
The linked repository has 1 star and 2 forks, showing a very small user and contributor footprint. Low popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but it provides little backing against the maintenance concerns.
The repository has no security policy. For a package implementing cryptographic algorithms, this weakens vulnerability-reporting transparency.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
fgrosse/phpasn1 Version ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.