Recent releases and an active, unarchived repository provide useful maintenance evidence, but the repository had no commits in the last three months and has no security policy or scanning. Documentation is present, and the organization-backed repository matches the package.
68%
Total Score
75
83
75
The package declares GPL-2.0-or-later and includes license files, so it is licensed; bundled files also identify MPL-1.1 and LGPL-2.1, creating licensing complexity that should be checked for compatibility.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. This is a meaningful maintenance concern, although the recent release history and December 2025 push partly offset it.
The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher, showing little public adoption or external review. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, so this only modestly lowers confidence in project maturity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning reduces security-process transparency without establishing that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy. For a server-side editor module, this leaves vulnerability reporting and response expectations unclear.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.