wvbforum/post-license
It has a clear MIT license, a README, and only one runtime dependency. Those basics make the small extension easy to inspect, but they do not offset its stale maintenance evidence and uncertain repository ownership.
42%
Total Score
50
100
79
100
Health Score Breakdown
Only one registry publishing maintainer is listed. This is a limited continuity buffer, and the repository's lack of recent activity provides no compensating maintenance evidence.
This is the package's only release, published over six years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That leaves compatibility and maintenance uncertain.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with a project that has been inactive since April 2020.
The repository name does not match the package name, and its README does not mention the package. That makes the source relationship less transparent, even though the file contents resemble the extension.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these counters provide no additional community or continuity signal.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Clark Winkelmann |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 flarum/core Version ^0.1.0-beta.8 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 6 years ago
- Created
- 6 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.