wpmet/utility-package
Healthy and actively maintained, with clear licensing and an organizational backing team. The main caveats are the absence of tests, a changelog, and a security policy, while the repository remains small and lightly popular.
78%
Total Score
100
83
90
Health Score Breakdown
A substantial README documents installation and usage, but neither the artifact nor repository includes tests or a changelog. Those omissions reduce maintenance transparency for a reusable library.
The repository has only 1 star and 6 forks, indicating limited public adoption. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a decisive health measure, especially given the active repository signals.
Composer build tooling is used, but no security scanning tools are configured. This is a transparency and assurance gap, though it is not evidence of unsafe code by itself.
No security policy is present in the repository, leaving vulnerability-reporting and response expectations undocumented.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 XpeedStudio |
| Wpmet |
Direct Dependencies
No direct dependencies.
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 11 days ago
- Created
- 3 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.