Healthy and usable, with a few maintenance and security-process caveats. The package is actively released, backed by the WordPress organization, and has strong repository documentation and tests, but recent work is concentrated in one contributor and the repository lacks security scanning and a security policy.
78%
Total Score
80
100
88
70
One of three workflows uses pull_request_target, which warrants review because that trigger can run with elevated repository context. No untrusted checkout or script-injection patterns were detected, limiting the concern.
All two recent commits came from one contributor, creating a concentrated maintenance dependency. The WordPress organizational backing provides some compensation, but no second recent contributor is shown.
There were two commits in the last three months from one active maintainer. Recent work is present, but the low volume gives only limited evidence of sustained maintenance.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a process gap, though it does not by itself indicate unsafe package health.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting and response expectations undocumented. This is a transparency gap for a package intended for dependency use.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.