A clear LGPL-3.0 license, tests, README, and release notes make the package transparent to consumers. Its small dependency footprint and lack of install-time scripts reduce operational risk, but no security policy leaves limited guidance for reporting issues.
40%
Total Score
50
100
75
75
The package has only two releases, with the latest published about seven years ago and none in the last 12 months. This is substantial abandonment risk despite the stable 1.0.1 release.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap. This materially lowers confidence in ongoing maintenance.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package. Although the file tree resembles a focused package, the linkage is less transparent than expected.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented channel or process for reporting vulnerabilities. This is a transparency gap, though it is less significant than the maintenance evidence.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
zendframework/zenddiagnostics Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.