wiserobot/module-iomnic

This release appears usable and actively maintained: it has more than three years of history, 94 releases including 27 in the last 12 months, a stable non-prerelease version, recent repository activity, clear licensing, and no deprecation or install-time lifecycle scripts. The main risks are concentrated maintenance with only one active contributor, no tests or changelog in either the artifact or repository, no security policy or scanning tooling, and very limited repository adoption signals. Overall, it is a viable dependency, but its long-term resilience and verification practices are weaker than those of a mature, broadly maintained project.

Latest 3.4.15

Packagist

72%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Dependencies

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Package scaffolding

A README and GitHub Releases are present, but neither the artifact nor repository contains tests or a changelog. For an integration module, this leaves maintenance and change-verification gaps.

Project backing

The repository owner is identified as Wiserobot-team with owner type User, not an organization. Therefore, the concentrated contributor activity is not visibly compensated by organizational maintenance capacity.

Repo bus factor

All 3 recent commits came from one contributor, giving the project a complete short-term contributor concentration and creating a meaningful continuity risk. The repository owner is recorded as a User rather than an organization, so there is no provided project-backing evidence to offset that concentration.

Repo issue activity

There are no open issues and one open pull request, but no issues or pull requests were closed or merged in the last month. This provides little evidence of responsive community maintenance.

Repo popularity

The repository has 0 stars, 1 fork, and 1 watcher. Low popularity is supporting caution about external validation, but it is not by itself evidence that a small package is unhealthy.