The repository is active, licensed, and has release notes. There is no security policy, and its small audience offers little independent evidence of resilience.
76%
Total Score
83
93
50
One contributor made all two commits in the last three months, creating concentration risk. Organization ownership provides some handoff capacity, but no second recently active contributor is shown.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tool was detected. That is a maintenance and oversight gap rather than evidence that the release is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy. For a package handling spam-protection functionality, this weakens the documented process for reporting and handling vulnerabilities.
All 17 analyzed action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility. The audit found no untrusted checkouts, script injection, dangerous triggers, or other reported findings, limiting this to a hygiene concern.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
silverstripe/cms Version ^5 | — | — |
silverstripe/framework Version ^5 | — | — |
silverstripe/spamprotection Version ^4 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.