The project has one active contributor, despite organization backing, and all 17 workflow action references are unpinned. Licensing, repository ownership, tests, release notes, and read-only workflow permissions provide useful safeguards.
68%
Total Score
80
100
93
75
The latest registry release was about 1 year and 7 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is a real maintenance concern, although recent repository commits show the project is not abandoned.
One contributor made all 18 commits in the last three months, creating a thin operational base. Organization ownership partly offsets handoff risk, but no second active contributor is shown.
There are six open pull requests and one new pull request in the last month, indicating ongoing contributor interest, although no pull requests were merged in that period.
No repository security policy was found. This is a transparency gap, but it is not by itself evidence that the package is unsafe to depend on.
The sole workflow uses read-only permissions and has no reported high- or medium-confidence audit findings. However, all 17 action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
silverstripe/cms Version ^5 | — | — |
silverstripe/asset-admin Version ^2.0 | — | — |
wedevelopnl/silverstripe-svg-image Version ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.