wedevelopnl/silverstripe-articles
Organization backing, a matching repository, and a clear MIT license provide useful continuity. Recent release and commit activity is limited, while the repository has no security scanning; the package remains maintained but deserves monitoring.
68%
Total Score
75
100
78
75
Health Score Breakdown
The package has 50 releases over about 3 years, but only 2 releases in the last 12 months, indicating a slower recent cadence.
The repository reports zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last 3 months, a strong sign of currently low maintenance activity despite the reported recent push.
There is one open issue and five open pull requests, but none were opened or merged in the last month, suggesting limited current collaboration.
The repository has few stars and only two forks, so external adoption is limited. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a health verdict, and organization backing partly offsets this weakness.
The project uses Make and Composer for builds, but no security-scanning tools were detected. That is a hygiene gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 WeDevelop |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 silverstripe/tagfield Version ^3.0 | — | — |
silverstripe/framework Version ^5.0 | — | — |
silverstripe/lumberjack Version ^3.0 | — | — |
unclecheese/display-logic Version ^3.0 | — | — |
silverstripe/vendor-plugin Version ^2.0 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 11 months ago
- Created
- 8 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.