Tests, release notes, and recent commits provide useful maintenance evidence. Adoption still deserves care because ownership is concentrated and the repository does not clearly identify this package; the license metadata also conflicts.
68%
Total Score
88
100
88
75
The artifact contains a license file, but it is detected as MIT while the manifest declares Apache-2.0. The package is licensed, yet the mismatch creates avoidable legal ambiguity.
One contributor made about 93% of the 28 recent commits, leaving a thin practical contributor base. Organization backing and a second active contributor partly compensate, but concentration remains a maintenance risk.
The repository name does not match webrium/foxql and its README does not mention this package; although name mismatches can be normal in monorepos, both signals together make package provenance less clear.
The repository has no published security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations unclear for a database library.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, script injection, or audit findings. However, all 8 action references are unpinned, a reproducibility and update-integrity hygiene gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.