The repository has no security policy or automated security scanning, and its small community offers limited independent review. MIT licensing, stable releases, and organizational backing provide useful reassurance.
64%
Total Score
67
86
75
The repository recorded 0 commits and 0 active maintainers in the last 3 months, indicating a recent pause in development. The latest release is recent and release history remains active, so this is a concern rather than abandonment evidence.
There are 5 open issues and no issues or pull requests were opened or closed in the last month. This shows limited recent community activity, although the absence of open pull requests is not inherently negative.
The repository has 9 stars, 7 forks, and 1 watcher, indicating a small user and contributor footprint. Popularity is supporting evidence only, but the limited visibility means less independent review.
The project uses Composer for builds, but no security-scanning tool was detected. The build tooling is appropriate for the ecosystem, while the missing scanning adds a modest maintenance and assurance concern.
The linked repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting and response expectations undocumented. This is a transparency gap, though it does not by itself show unsafe code.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
topthink/think-orm Version ^2.0.53 || ^3.0.0 || ^4.0.30 || dev-master | — | — |
topthink/think-container Version ^2.0|^3.0 | — | — |
workerman/webman-framework Version ^2.1 || dev-master | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.