The repository is small, has no tests or security policy, and shows little community activity. An organization owns the matching source, the package includes a README, and its release is not deprecated or archived.
57%
Total Score
100
63
75
The latest release was about two years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This indicates substantial maintenance risk for a package intended for ongoing service infrastructure.
The manifest declares MIT, but the artifact license file is detected as Apache-2.0. The release is licensed, but the mismatch creates avoidable legal and transparency uncertainty.
The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these very low adoption signals provide little confidence or review capacity.
Composer is used for builds, but no security-scanning tooling was detected. That is a modest transparency and maintenance weakness rather than evidence of an unsafe release.
The repository has no security policy. For a service-discovery component that handles network communication, the missing reporting guidance reduces transparency.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
monolog/monolog Version ^2.8 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.4 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/promises Version ^1.5 | ^2.0 | — | — |
workerman/workerman Version ^4.0.4 || ^5.0.0 | — | — |
webpatser/laravel-uuid Version ^4.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.