The package is small and easy to inspect, with no install-time scripts and a repository that matches the package. Its license metadata conflicts with the MIT license file, while the project has no tests, security policy, or recent development activity.
48%
Total Score
0
69
75
Only two releases exist, and none were published in the last 12 months; the latest release was nearly two years ago. This is meaningful abandonment risk for a library dependency.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, with no other provided maintenance signal compensating for the inactivity.
A license file is present, but the declared OSL-3.0/AFL-3.0 licenses conflict with the detected MIT license in that file. The release is licensed, but the mismatch reduces transparency.
The repository has only 1 star and 1 fork, providing little evidence of broad community adoption or outside maintenance capacity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. This is a modest hygiene gap, not a standalone dependency blocker.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.