The package includes tests, a clear MIT license, and an organization-backed repository with a matching README. Its workflow lacks pinned action references and the project has no documented security policy, so maintenance and build hygiene deserve attention.
67%
Total Score
75
100
81
67
The package has four releases over about four years, with one release in the last 12 months and a median interval of about 14 months. This is slow but not abandonment on its own, especially because version 0.4.0 was released recently.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months. This is a meaningful maintenance concern, although the repository received a release shortly before the observation period.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. For a small library this is a hygiene gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
The repository has no security policy. That reduces transparency about vulnerability reporting and response expectations.
Version 0.4.0 is not a prerelease, and no recent releases are prereleases. The pre-1.0 major version still signals API stability may be less established than a mature 1.x package.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
doctrine/collections Version ^1.8|^2.1 | — | — |
doctrine/persistence Version ^2.3|^3.2|^4.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.