The organization-backed repository is not archived, and the package has only two runtime dependencies. There is no license, security policy, or scanning evidence, which leaves important maintenance and usage questions unresolved.
42%
Total Score
100
100
50
75
The latest release was about eight years ago, with only two releases overall and none in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency.
No license declaration or license file was detected in the package or repository. That creates a concrete legal and transparency concern for adoption.
The package has no README, tests, or changelog, while the repository also reports no tests or changelog. Missing tests and changelog are less important for a small utility package, but the absent README weakens consumer guidance.
The repository has no security policy. This is not evidence of a vulnerability, but it reduces transparency about how security issues are handled.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nette/utils Version ^2.3 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.