The license file conflicts with the MIT manifest declaration, and the repository has no tests, security scanning, or security policy. It is not archived and has no install scripts, but its long inactivity makes this release a poor dependency choice.
36%
Total Score
0
58
75
This is the package's only release, published about 10 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency.
The repository recorded no commits or active maintainers in the last 3 months, and its last push was about 6 years ago. This provides little evidence of ongoing maintenance.
The artifact includes a license file, so the release is licensed, but it declares MIT while the detected file identifies LGPL-2.1. The mismatch creates legal uncertainty for consumers.
The repository has 0 stars, 1 fork, and 1 watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these counts provide no meaningful community-maintenance signal.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tooling was detected. That is a modest transparency and maintenance gap for a dependency.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.