wbreeze/sol-pay-client

This is a very new, pre-1.0 package with three releases published within roughly one hour and no observed commit or maintainer activity over the preceding three months, so its maintenance maturity and long-term stability are not yet established. The package is nevertheless transparent and reasonably structured: it has an extensive README, a small runtime dependency footprint, explicit MIT/Apache-2.0 licensing, no install-time scripts, repository tests that are not included in the artifact, and no dangerous workflow configuration. The linked repository is not archived and its README explicitly references the package, reducing concern that it is an unrelated repository. Suitable for cautious evaluation, but adoption should account for its extremely limited history and absent security policy.

Latest v0.1.2

Packagist

62%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Dependencies

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Project backing

The repository owner is an individual user rather than an organization. This does not imply poor health, but it means there is no observed organizational backing to compensate for the very thin project history.

Release history

The package is only 0 days old with three releases and a median interval of about 56 minutes. Rapid initial releases provide some activity evidence, but there is not yet enough history to establish sustained maintenance.

Repo commit activity

No commits and no active maintainers were observed during the last three months. Because the repository and package are extremely new, this may largely reflect limited observation time, but it still leaves sustained maintenance unproven.

Repo issue activity

There are no open issues or pull requests and no recent issue or pull-request activity. Given the package's age, this is inconclusive, but it provides no additional evidence of an established maintenance community.

Repo popularity

The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. For a package published only hours ago, this is expected and weak evidence rather than a standalone abandonment verdict.