The five-file tree has no consumer README, and the repository has no security scanning. MIT licensing and one runtime dependency limit complexity but do not make maintenance predictable.
38%
Total Score
0
38
50
The package has only two releases, with the latest published in March 2017 and none in the last 12 months. That long release gap is strong evidence of abandonment risk.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the release history showing no activity since March 2017.
The published artifact contains only five files, including two source files and no documentation beyond configuration. This makes the package difficult to evaluate and integrate.
The package has no README, while its lack of tests and changelog is normal packaging practice and is not treated as a gap. The missing consumer documentation still reduces transparency.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these counters provide no additional adoption or maintenance signal.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.