Healthy and usable for a dependency, with a young project and a few repository-security gaps to review. It has tests, documentation, a matching source repository, recent commits from two contributors, and no deprecation or install scripts.
78%
Total Score
70
100
89
80
Only one account has registry publishing access, which limits release-account redundancy. However, repository activity shows a second active contributor, partly reducing the maintenance concern.
The package and repository are both owned by the same individual account, so the source relationship is clear. Individual ownership provides less organizational maintenance redundancy than an organization-backed project.
The project is only 56 days old and has three releases, with releases clustered within about one hour. That shows initial activity but provides limited long-term maintenance evidence.
There were no new or closed issues and no pull requests in the last month. With a young repository this is ambiguous rather than evidence of abandonment, though it provides little external maintenance signal.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool is reported. The missing scanner is a transparency gap, not evidence that the package is unsafe or unmaintained.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
ratchet/pawl Version ^0.4.1 | — | — |
react/socket Version ^1.12 | — | — |
react/event-loop Version ^1.3 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.5 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.