The tiny README gives consumers little guidance, and the project has no tests or security policy. Its simple dependency profile and matching repository reduce complexity, but the long-standing lack of maintenance remains a serious concern.
38%
Total Score
0
100
58
50
Only one release exists, published nearly 10 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This strongly suggests abandonment risk despite the package not being registry-deprecated.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with its last push being nearly 10 years ago. This is strong evidence that maintenance has stopped.
The package includes a README, but it is only 19 characters long and the repository has no tests or changelog. Missing tests and changelog are normal for published artifacts, while the extremely limited consumer documentation is a real usability gap for a library.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these numbers provide no meaningful evidence of an active user or contributor community.
The repository has no security policy. This is not proof of a security problem, but it reduces transparency and leaves maintainers' vulnerability-reporting process unclear.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
zfr/rbac Version ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.