vf92/bitrix-base
The MIT license is present, but the manifest calls it proprietary, and no security policy is published. The package has useful documentation and a substantial source tree, yet its maintenance evidence is too old for a new dependency.
38%
Total Score
0
67
75
Health Score Breakdown
The latest release was published about 7 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. Its history of 84 releases shows prior activity but does not offset the prolonged inactivity.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the release gap and indicating a serious abandonment risk.
The artifact contains an MIT license file, which provides licensing evidence, but the manifest declares the package proprietary. That inconsistency reduces transparency even though a license is present.
The repository name does not match the package name, and its README does not mention the package, leaving uncertainty about whether this repository is the authoritative source.
The linked repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and vulnerability-reporting gap, though it is less significant than the prolonged maintenance inactivity.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Sergey Frolov |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 psr/log Version ^1.1.0 | — | — |
symfony/yaml Version >=3.1 | — | — |
symfony/config Version >=3.1 | — | — |
monolog/monolog Version ^1.24 | — | — |
symfony/console Version >=3.1 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 7 years ago
- Created
- 8 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.