The README and release notes give consumers a clear starting point. MIT licensing and a repository that matches the package reduce transparency concerns, while the lone maintainer and absent security tooling leave limited operational depth.
52%
Total Score
25
75
50
The package has had three releases, but its latest release was about 18 months ago and there were no releases in the last 12 months. This indicates stalled maintenance for a payment integration.
The repository recorded no commits or active maintainers in the last 3 months, and its last push was about 18 months ago. That leaves little evidence of ongoing maintenance.
One registry maintainer creates a thin publishing and support base. The repository is user-owned rather than organization-owned, so there is no provided backing signal to offset that concentration.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. For a payment package, this is a meaningful process gap, though it does not prove the code is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented. This matters more for a package handling payment flows.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
monolog/monolog Version * | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ~5.0|^6.0|^7.0|^8.0|^9.0|^10.0|^11.0 | — | — |
phpseclib/phpseclib Version ^2 | — | — |
bramus/monolog-colored-line-formatter Version ^3.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.