Usable with caveats: it is actively released and the repository is current, but maintenance is concentrated in one contributor and the project lacks tests, a changelog, and a security policy. Review updates carefully before adopting it in a production CMS.
68%
Total Score
50
50
83
88
There are 9 runtime dependencies, including framework, HTTP, document, image, PDF, and export libraries. This is a meaningful dependency surface for a CMS, but not unusually large enough by itself to make the release unfit.
Only one registry account has publish access. That is a real publishing continuity concern for a user-owned project, although the same account is actively committing to the repository.
A substantial README is present, but neither the package artifact nor repository contains tests or a changelog. For a feature-rich CMS package, those missing verification and change-history resources reduce transparency.
The registry namespace and repository are owned by the same individual account, not an organization. This confirms package ownership alignment but provides no organizational maintenance redundancy.
One contributor made all 8 commits in the last 3 months, giving the project a 100% top-contributor share. With user ownership rather than organization backing, this is a material continuity risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
livewire/livewire Version ^3.0 | — | — |
maatwebsite/excel Version ^3.1 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ^11.0|^12.0 | — | — |
spatie/pdf-to-image Version ^3.1 | — | — |
symfony/dom-crawler Version ^7.4 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.