The source has solid packaging, a clear GPL-3.0-or-later declaration, and organizational ownership. Maintenance evidence is thin, while the workflow needs tighter permissions and pinned actions before relying on it broadly.
58%
Total Score
75
88
50
The package is 100 days old but has only one release, so there is not enough release history to demonstrate an established maintenance pattern.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months, leaving current maintenance capacity unproven.
The repository has no security policy, which reduces transparency for reporting and handling vulnerabilities, although this is a moderate gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
The sole workflow gives every workflow top-level write access, uses both actions without pinning, and contains a high-confidence template-injection finding; no untrusted trigger or checkout sink was reported, so this is a hygiene concern rather than a severe standalone risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
moodle/moodle Version 4.1.* || 4.2.* || 4.3.* || 4.4.* || 4.5.* || 5.0.* || 5.1.* || 5.2.* | — | — |
composer/installers Version ~1.0 || ~2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.