Template Response Class for standardized response format
60%
Total Score
caution
Usable with caveats: no releases in two years and no recent commits show stalled maintenance.
One registry maintainer is responsible for publishing the package, creating a thin continuity base. The repository is also owned by that individual, so this is a genuine single-maintainer risk rather than an organization-publishing artifact.
The package has had only two releases, both about 730 days ago, with none in the last 12 months. This suggests stalled release maintenance, although the linked repository was pushed more recently.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months. That weakens evidence of ongoing maintenance for a package whose latest registry release is already about 730 days old.
The linked repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting expectations unclear. This is a transparency gap, but it does not by itself indicate that the package is unsafe.
All 3 analyzed action references are unpinned, and one workflow grants top-level write permissions. No untrusted checkout, script injection, or high-severity finding was reported, so this is a hygiene caution rather than a severe risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
illuminate/contracts Version ^10.0||^11.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.