Package Health

tuupola/ksuid

The MIT license, tests, changelog, and recent stable release provide a solid foundation. Maintenance evidence is mixed because there were no commits in the last three months, while workflow dependencies are not pinned and no security policy is present.

Latest 2.1.1PackagistPackagist

68%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

50

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

94

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

75

Health Score Breakdown

Repo commit activitycaution

The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months. This weakens current maintenance evidence, although the recent release history partly offsets the concern.

Repo toolingcaution

The project uses Make and Composer, but no security-scanning tools were detected. That is a transparency and hygiene gap rather than evidence that the release is unsafe.

Security policycaution

No security policy was found in the repository, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations and response processes undocumented.

Workflow auditcaution

The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no audit findings or untrusted triggers, but all four action references are unpinned. That leaves avoidable build-integrity exposure without evidence of an active exploit path.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Mika Tuupola

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
tuupola/base62
Version ^1.0|^2.0
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
6 months ago
Created
9 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform