The MIT license, tests, changelog, and recent stable release provide a solid foundation. Maintenance evidence is mixed because there were no commits in the last three months, while workflow dependencies are not pinned and no security policy is present.
68%
Total Score
50
100
94
75
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers during the last three months. This weakens current maintenance evidence, although the recent release history partly offsets the concern.
The project uses Make and Composer, but no security-scanning tools were detected. That is a transparency and hygiene gap rather than evidence that the release is unsafe.
No security policy was found in the repository, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations and response processes undocumented.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no audit findings or untrusted triggers, but all four action references are unpinned. That leaves avoidable build-integrity exposure without evidence of an active exploit path.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
tuupola/base62 Version ^1.0|^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.