A single publisher and no repository security policy or scanning leave limited protection if maintenance stops. The recent release, tests, README, and clear MIT licensing provide useful support.
68%
Total Score
50
100
50
Only one registry account has publishing access, creating a thin release base and higher bus-factor risk. The linked repository is owned by the same individual, so there is no shown organizational backing to compensate.
The repository has no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, which indicates sparse ongoing maintenance. This is partly offset by the release published on the latest push date, but it remains a meaningful abandonment concern.
The repository has no security policy and no security scanning tools. For a package that handles email functionality, this reduces transparency and makes vulnerability reporting and detection less clear.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nette/di Version ~3.0 | — | — |
nette/mail Version ^4.0 | — | — |
latte/latte Version ^2.11 | ^3.0 | — | — |
nette/utils Version ^4.0 | — | — |
nette/application Version ~3.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.