The repository is tiny, has no security scanning or policy, and is maintained by one registry account. MIT licensing, a matching source repository, and no install scripts reduce adoption friction.
58%
Total Score
50
100
81
75
The package has only five releases over roughly 11 years, with no release in more than four years and none in the last 12 months. This indicates a slow, currently inactive maintenance pattern.
The repository recorded no commits and had no active maintainers in the last three months; combined with the old latest release, this raises abandonment risk.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher, providing little supporting evidence of community review or external adoption. Popularity is secondary, so this only modestly lowers confidence.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. For a small library this is a hygiene gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy, reducing transparency about vulnerability reporting and maintenance handling. This is a moderate process gap, not a standalone reason to reject the package.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nette/di Version ^3.0.12 | — | — |
nette/utils Version ^3.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.