Documentation, tests, and clear MIT licensing support straightforward adoption. Keep the dependency under review because its maintenance and workflow pinning history are still thin.
61%
Total Score
50
100
81
83
The repository owner is a user account rather than an organization, so there is no demonstrated organizational backing to offset the thin maintenance history.
Only one release exists, published about 10 months ago, so there is little release history from which to judge ongoing maintenance.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last 3 months. For a package released only once, this is a meaningful maintenance concern.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanner is a modest transparency gap rather than evidence of abandonment.
The repository has no security policy. That weakens vulnerability-reporting transparency for a network-facing proxy package.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/log Version ^3|^2|^1 | — | — |
tourze/enum-extra Version 1.0.* | — | — |
workerman/workerman Version ^5.1 | — | — |
tourze/workerman-psr-logger Version 0.0.* | — | — |
tourze/workerman-connection-pipe Version 0.0.* | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.