Tests, a clear README, release notes, and a matching repository provide useful coverage. Recent development activity is absent, and all three workflow actions are unpinned, which weakens confidence in ongoing maintenance and build hygiene.
68%
Total Score
83
100
89
83
The package has only two releases, both within a four-day period, followed by roughly ten months without another release. This is limited evidence of sustained maintenance for a package intended as a reusable contract library.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Although the repository is not archived, this is a concrete sign that maintenance may have slowed or stopped.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tool was detected. That is a modest repository hygiene gap rather than a standalone dependency risk.
The repository has no security policy. For a contracts-only library this is a transparency gap, but it is less serious than for a package handling credentials or runtime infrastructure.
Both workflows were fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, or audit findings. However, all three action references are unpinned, leaving build inputs less reproducible and increasing workflow supply-chain exposure.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
tourze/enum-extra Version 1.0.* | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.