The package is easy to inspect, with a clear README, tests, a small runtime dependency set, and a valid MIT license. Its workflows have no dangerous audit findings, but stronger maintenance and build-pinning evidence would make adoption more comfortable.
68%
Total Score
50
100
83
100
The registry namespace and repository owner match, but the owner is an individual account rather than an organization, so there is no clear organizational backing to offset the thin activity evidence.
Three releases over about 18 months, with one release in the last 12 months and a median interval of about 111 days, show real publishing activity but a modest cadence.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, which is a meaningful maintenance concern despite the repository not being archived.
The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher; popularity is only supporting evidence, but this provides little external adoption signal.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool was detected. This is a hygiene gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
symfony/http-kernel Version ^7.3 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.