toolkit/web-utils

MIT licensing, tests, and a two-dependency footprint support straightforward evaluation. There is no security policy, and the project shows little adoption, so maintenance expectations should remain modest.

Latest v1.0.6

Packagist

40%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Dependencies

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Release history

The latest release was about 7 years and 11 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency, despite seven historical releases.

Repo commit activity

There were no commits or active maintainers in the last 3 months, reinforcing the evidence that development has stopped. This materially raises maintenance and abandonment risk.

Repo popularity

The repository has only 2 stars, 0 forks, and 1 watcher. Low adoption is supporting caution about maturity and community resilience, though popularity alone is not decisive.

Repo tooling

Composer is used as the build tool, but no security scanning tools are present. The missing scanning is a hygiene gap for a package with no recent maintenance.

Security policy

No repository security policy was found, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations undocumented. This is a transparency gap, although it is less significant than the long-term inactivity.