tonyhhyip/sse

Project backingcaution

The repository is owned by an individual user rather than an organization. That is consistent with the two-person maintainer base but provides less visible maintenance redundancy.

Repo bus factorcaution

Two contributors were active recently, but the top contributor made 75% of the commits. That concentration leaves some maintainer-continuity risk for a user-owned project.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning reduces automated supply-chain visibility without making the package unfit by itself.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy. For a server-side library, this is a transparency gap because it gives users no documented path for reporting vulnerabilities.

Workflow auditcaution

The single workflow was fully analyzed and uses read-only permissions, with no dangerous audit findings. However, all 3 action references are unpinned, leaving avoidable action-supply-chain exposure.