Usable with caveats: the release is well documented, tested, licensed, and backed by an organization, but the project has only two releases and no commits or active maintainers in the last three months. Review its maintenance expectations before adopting it for a critical application.
68%
Total Score
75
100
89
75
One workflow uses pull_request_target, which warrants review because that trigger can run with elevated repository context, although no untrusted checkout or script injection was detected.
The package has only two releases over about 20 months, with one release in the last 12 months; this indicates a small and infrequent release history despite the current release being recent.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Recent merged pull requests and the current release provide some counterevidence, but the absence of recent commit activity remains a maintenance concern.
The repository has only two stars and no forks, so there is little external adoption evidence; popularity is supporting evidence rather than a health verdict, and the documented project structure partly compensates.
Two workflows grant top-level write permissions and one workflow lacks top-level permissions, leaving broader-than-necessary GitHub Actions access as a transparency and hardening concern.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.8 | — | — |
laravel/framework Version ^12.0|^13.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.