tillklockmann/naona

The MIT license, clear README, and matching repository improve transparency, while the tiny codebase and lack of tests or security scanning limit confidence. The project appears lightly maintained despite the repository remaining available.

Latest 1.0.1

Packagist

55%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Release history

Only two releases were published, both in September 2020, with no release in about six years. This is a substantial maintenance concern for a dependency.

Repo commit activity

The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the old release history, this points to very limited current maintenance.

Package scaffolding

A README is included and the repository uses GitHub Releases, but there are no tests or changelog. The missing tests reduce maintenance confidence for a template engine, while the absent changelog is not required in the package artifact.

Repo issue activity

There are no open issues or pull requests and no activity in the last month. This is consistent with a small project but offers no evidence of an active support community.

Repo popularity

The repository has one star and no forks, indicating little external adoption or community validation. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but it provides little maintenance confidence here.