tigress/http_requests
It has a clear license, stable releases, and no install-time scripts. The small project has limited testing, security process, and maintainer capacity, so long-term support is uncertain.
61%
Total Score
50
100
78
75
Health Score Breakdown
A README is present and the package includes a MANUAL.md, but the README is only 57 characters and there are no tests or changelog. Missing tests and changelog are normal in published artifacts, so the documentation gap is the main limitation.
There were 0 commits and 0 active maintainers in the last 3 months, despite recent registry publication, leaving current development activity unconfirmed.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package. That raises concern that the linked source may not clearly document this release.
The repository has 0 stars, 0 forks, and 1 watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these figures provide little evidence of broad community validation.
The repository uses Composer, but no security scanning tool is configured. This is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Rudy Mas |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 monolog/monolog Version ^3.9 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 4 months ago
- Created
- 1 year ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.