thewebmen/silverstripe-calendarfield
It is clearly licensed and has no install-time scripts, which reduces adoption friction. The single-maintainer project has no security policy, and the repository’s identity mismatch makes ownership harder to verify.
38%
Total Score
50
67
75
Health Score Breakdown
The latest release was 8 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite the package having had five releases initially.
The repository had no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the long release gap and indicating no current maintenance capacity.
The artifact includes a README, but it is only 52 characters and says documentation remains to be written. Missing tests and changelog files are normal packaging practice and do not lower the score.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package, making it harder to verify that the linked source repository belongs to this release.
The linked repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and maintenance gap, though it is less significant than the prolonged inactivity.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Michel van der Steege |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 silverstripe/cms Version ^4.0@dev | — | — |
silverstripe/vendor-plugin Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 8 years ago
- Created
- 8 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.