Two active contributors and a repository updated recently support continued maintenance, while the organization backing adds resilience. The license metadata conflicts, the repository lacks a security policy, and its sole workflow uses an unpinned action.
78%
Total Score
100
100
88
83
The artifact contains an MIT license file, but the manifest declares the package proprietary; that mismatch reduces licensing clarity despite the repository also containing a license file.
The repository uses Composer for builds, but no security scanning tooling was observed; this is a modest transparency and maintenance gap.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.
The workflow audit completed cleanly with no untrusted checkouts, script injection, or high-confidence findings, but its only action reference is unpinned, weakening build reproducibility.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
thelia/installer Version ~1.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.